The Supreme Court has limited the use of warrantless searching of houses.

Spread the love

The United States Supreme Court decided on Monday that a doctrine that allows police to conduct warrantless searching in certain cases would not extend to entering private residences.

The court ruled 9-0 that police officers overstepped their limits after they confiscated two handguns from a Rhode Island man’s home without a warrant after he had a heated altercation with his wife.

Both liberal and conservative critics have argued against the police role in the case, warning that upholding lower court rulings would significantly broaden the justifications for performing warrantless searches.

In writing for the court in the case of Caniglia vs. Strom, Justice Clarence Thomas determined that the “community caretaking” exception — under which police can carry out warrantless searches if they are performing “community caretaking functions” — does not apply to entering private homes.

“The very core of the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee is the right of a person to retreat into his or her home and ‘there be free from unreasonable governmental intrusion,'” Thomas wrote.

READ ALSO:  Trump touts 'fantastic' TikTok deal with Walmart and Oracle

In the case, petitioner Edward Caniglia placed a handgun on the dining room table and asked his wife to “shoot [him] and get it over with.” His wife instead left the home and spent the night at a hotel.

After she was unable to reach her husband by phone the next morning, she called the police to request a welfare check. The responding officers accompanied the wife to the home, where they encountered Caniglia on the porch. Believing he could pose a risk to himself or others, the officers called an ambulance.

Caniglia agreed to go to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation on the condition that the officers not confiscate his firearms. But once he left, the court said, the officers nonetheless located and seized his guns.

Caniglia sued, claiming that the officers had entered his home and seized him and his firearms without a warrant in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Lower courts found in favor of the officers, basing their decisions on a theory that the removal of Caniglia and his firearms from his home was justified by the community caretaking exception to warrant requirements.

READ ALSO:  I’m not your fan, Trump slams Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

The exception states that police can, for instance, legally carry out a warrantless search of an impounded vehicle in the course of their civic duties. But that doctrine is “not an open-ended license to perform them anywhere,” Thomas wrote.

“What is reasonable for vehicles is different from what is reasonable for homes,” he said.

In a rare instance of agreement, both the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Conservative Union Foundation joined the libertarian Cato Institute in a joint brief urging the court to restrict the community caretaking exception “to its historic vehicle-related origins.”

 178 

Leave a Reply